Rebounding was actually closer than you'd think. 35-28

Post #1763687 ◀ PREV NEXT ▶

Joined: 10/07/1999

Posts: 62,200

Likes: 39,392

LonghornHokie

Posted: 11/26/2025 at 08:00 PM ET

(In response to this post by 89HOKIE)

Our defensive ranking on Kenpom improved 19 points** -- VT ChemE 1986 Nov 26, 2025 at 07:53 PM ET

VT ChemE 1986 • 11/26/25 07:53 PM ET

Good for us Kenpom did not see all the O rebounds by CSU.** -- 89HOKIE Nov 26, 2025 at 07:56 PM ET

89HOKIE • 11/26/25 07:56 PM ET

Rebounding was actually closer than you'd think. 35-28** ◄ -- LonghornHokie Nov 26, 2025 at 08:00 PM ET

LonghornHokie • 11/26/25 08:00 PM ET

Check those offensive rebounds.** -- 89HOKIE Nov 26, 2025 at 08:03 PM ET

89HOKIE • 11/26/25 08:03 PM ET

I think we had 4 and 0 points on one trip** -- ridgecreekhokie Nov 26, 2025 at 08:24 PM ET

ridgecreekhokie • 11/26/25 08:24 PM ET

11-5. Not as bad as it seemed. Ball just seemed to bounce CSU's way a few -- LonghornHokie Nov 26, 2025 at 08:06 PM ET

LonghornHokie • 11/26/25 08:06 PM ET

Yes, it just happens despite effort to get a rebound.** -- KiloZulu Nov 26, 2025 at 08:54 PM ET

KiloZulu • 11/26/25 08:54 PM ET

Practically same defensive rebounds for each team but twice as many -- 89HOKIE Nov 26, 2025 at 08:11 PM ET

89HOKIE • 11/26/25 08:11 PM ET