I think UNC’s pitching just ran out of gas. They had some good arms but…
They relied heavily on about 5 really good arms this year. It caught up with one of their starters who had to leave one of the Finals games early due to an injury and then McDuffie wasn’t quite as effective as he normally was all season and then trying to go back to Glauber on no days rest ended up not working.
In any case, here is a quick comparison of the two teams’ pitching depth. Obviously, the offenses were a factor as well with how hot Oklahoma was swinging the bat, but I think their pitching depth also helped them immensely against UNC.
• UNC had just 9 pitchers that threw at least 20 innings on the year. Of those 9, three threw 90+ innings and another threw 70+. They were also a little thin on quality outside their top 4 or 5. Of the 9 pitchers that threw 20 innings, only 6 had ERA’s under 6.00.
• In comparison, Oklahoma had 11 pitchers that threw at least 20 innings on the year with none of them throwing over 80 innings. They also had more balance and quality of depth as 10 of the 11 had ERA’s under 6.00.
Thread Replies (4)
Well, the Holes got smacked good tonight 13-2.
-- RJHokie
Jun 22, 2026 at 10:55 PM ET
RJHokie
•
06/22/26 10:55 PM ET
I think UNC’s pitching just ran out of gas. They had some good arms but…
◄
-- QCP
Jun 23, 2026 at 12:35 AM ET
QCP
•
06/23/26 12:35 AM ET
3.5 hour game - unc used 9 pitchers, threw 220 pitches**
-- 3TechFanz
Jun 23, 2026 at 11:04 AM ET
3TechFanz
•
06/23/26 11:04 AM ET
Forbes tried to rely too much on Glauber and McDuffie too early
-- hokiepro
Jun 23, 2026 at 06:56 AM ET
hokiepro
•
06/23/26 06:56 AM ET
That's what got them there **
-- HokiesACC2004
Jun 24, 2026 at 05:45 AM ET
HokiesACC2004
•
06/24/26 05:45 AM ET