regards to consistency. I don't care if officials are calling it tight or letting them play just be consistent in both directions. If you are calling touch fouls on one end then don't let them hammer people on the other. Same with things like holding and pass interference in football. A recent example would be the umpires in the VT/UNC game that got heated. I have no problem with them tossing the VT batter for the bat slam or the VT player for chirping at the first baseman after the inning. But if you're going to eject them because of an earlier warning then you have to toss the UNC pitcher for throwing behind the batter and you have to toss the UNC player who was out of the dugout screaming and pointing. And to be clear I wasn't advocating for officials to not make calls at the end of a game. I was just acknowledging that it's not often possible to put yourself in a position where they can't impact the result. The football game versus Miami is a great example. Yes you can argue that it shouldn't have come down to the final play. But we were an underdog, on the road, against a top 10 team. The chances of us blowing them out to a point where officiating doesn't matter were slim to none. And in the end the officials screwed up and it cost us a major win. Sure you can point to plays or calls earlier in the game and play what if but at least in this specific instance the officials literally changed a win to a loss in spite of the rulebook.