Much has been written over the last decade about the demise of regional rivalries as conferences and schools play musical chairs. And, sadly, CFB has survived without traditional rivalries such as Oklahoma/Nebraska, WVU/Pitt, and many others. The next domino to fall in the creation of a Super League is the loss of regional identity. Intersectional games used to happen only in Bowl Games or a very rare OOC agreement. I remember a PSU vs. Nebraska OOC game played maybe 30 years ago that was "must see", since intersectional games were almost never played on campus. (Now it's a B1G conference game and nobody cares.) In the next few years, the B1G and SEC will enjoy big ratings for new intersectional conference games between legacy programs. Games like these: * Ohio State / USC * Michigan / USC * Ohio State / Oregon * Georgia / Texas * Alabama / Texas * LSU / Oklahoma These games move the needle because they rarely play each other. But once the novelty wears off in a few years, will games like these be any different from a traditional middle-of-the-road B1G or SEC game? With everyone playing each other, many of these traditional powers will lose more games, and some will drop off (see Nebraska over the last decade). And then... the shiny new intersectional objects might have to be intersectional games with ACC and Big XII teams. Don't dismiss the interest generated by an intersectional matchup. Notre Dame does very well when they schedule an intersectional game with a school they rarely play. Heck, the first time Notre Dame played VT at Lane Stadium was nationally hyped (despite VT underperforming prior to the game). I expect the B1G and SEC are going to kill the golden goose with their restrictive Super League approach. But once the novelty of it wears off, there will be a lot of eyeballs interested in the schools left behind.