All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

VTHokie2000
Joined: 01/01/2005
Posts: 41,416
Likes: 17,028

Given the ACC's history of making decisions based on assumptions or good

faith on ESPN's future actions, history could end up repeating itself. The ACC believes (again) that if it agrees to the deal, then the ACC's new agreement with ESPN, which would require a new GOR, would be equal to or greater the value of the current agreement. Some of the schools may even be on board with the idea because of informal conversations their leadership has had with ESPN assuming the schools form a new conference or rebrand the ACC because the brand name has been tarnished.
Posted: 04/11/2024 at 09:48 AM ET
(In response to this post by VTCALS72)

Thread Replies (36)

Full Thread →
Rohan Law has been following the court cases and had an interesting post
HokieAl 04/10/24 06:25 PM ET
plagiarism! Rohan is cutting and pasting from this board, lol
daveinop 04/11/24 09:07 AM ET
Except currently, ESPN in not on
Big12 guy 04/11/24 09:24 AM ET
Rohan's new position is exactly what has been posted here since the suit
daveinop 04/12/24 07:45 AM ET
Isn't the CW deal evidence that the GOR applies beyond the ESPN agreement?**
obguthr 04/11/24 08:02 AM ET
impossible to answer without knowing what is in the espn deal
HokieAl 04/11/24 08:19 AM ET
A court will decide that.
VTCALS72 04/11/24 07:17 AM ET
So if ESPN exercises option tomorrow doesn’t Clemson’s argument go away?
HwoodHokie 04/10/24 08:01 PM ET
That is what some court will have to determine.
VTCALS72 04/11/24 07:29 AM ET
Mr. Rohan will appear on College Football Mafia 8 pm tonight**
33laszlo99 04/10/24 07:24 PM ET
HIS PREDICTION: Settlement for 150-180m AFTER 15 Aug 2024 to leave for '26.
Maroon Baboon 04/10/24 10:50 PM ET
FSU will announce they are leaving
INSIDE99 04/12/24 12:14 AM ET
Hmm. What about Clemson?**
Maroon Baboon 04/12/24 12:18 AM ET
If ACC does settle for peanuts then the members should have Phillips' head
HokieNoVA 04/11/24 09:18 AM ET
That's about 10 million per school to not have FSU for a decade.
Maroon Baboon 04/11/24 10:44 AM ET
Why would the ACC, who represents the non mag 7 as much as it
VTCALS72 04/11/24 07:33 AM ET
Given the ACC's history of making decisions based on assumptions or good
VTHokie2000 04/11/24 09:48 AM ET
This GOR is good until 2036 until a court says different.
VTCALS72 04/11/24 11:43 AM ET
I wouldn't rule out the possibility of ESPN's opinion on the matter
VTHokie2000 04/11/24 11:51 AM ET
Yeah but getting back to a P5 is long gone
VTCALS72 04/11/24 12:46 PM ET
Depending on how things shake out the PAC 2.0, ACC 2.0, and Big XII may be
VTHokie2000 04/11/24 01:38 PM ET
IMHO they are almost legally required to fight it to the bitter end.**
VTCALS72 04/11/24 07:34 AM ET
The bitter end might be 2027.
Maroon Baboon 04/11/24 10:54 AM ET
I dont see ACC ever agreeing to a settlement like that
Hokie83 04/11/24 07:27 AM ET
So the question is...
EDGEMAN 04/10/24 07:00 PM ET
IMHO ESPN will not blow up the ACC.
VTCALS72 04/11/24 07:50 AM ET
I don't think that is the question. It
Big12 guy 04/10/24 07:22 PM ET
Until a court says otherwise, the GOR is separate from the Media Contract.
VTCALS72 04/11/24 12:50 PM ET
I'm sure the contract extension will have provisions for the loss of...
EDGEMAN 04/10/24 08:07 PM ET
Isn't this a "look in" and not any negotiating something different?**
VTCALS72 04/11/24 12:51 PM ET
Not exactly since ESPN is the only one with the power to exercise the
VTHokie2000 04/11/24 01:40 PM ET
All ACC teams signed the GOR and got the deal
VTCALS72 04/11/24 03:33 PM ET
Here's an article that talks about the look-in dates changing from 2017 and
VTHokie2000 04/11/24 06:08 PM ET
I remember reading an article around the time the modification was done in
VTHokie2000 04/11/24 06:00 PM ET
I as well think that is right
VTCALS72 04/11/24 08:26 PM ET
Given the timing of the pandemic, it may be a little more difficult to
VTHokie2000 04/12/24 02:46 PM ET
Do you think those are being negotiated
Big12 guy 04/10/24 08:15 PM ET