3
Joined:
02/21/2013
Posts:
1,666
Likes:
766
Don't hold back the sarcasm Stech. I think it's more fun.
None of these participants has clean hands. Each conference acts in its own interest. I never thought the original "Alliance" was anything more than a voting bloc to stop The SEC from controlling the playoffs.
I have said forever that there is no P2; there is a P1 and another P1. The SEC and B1G are in a bit of a chess match with huge stakes. I just saw a post on another board that proposed an alliance (actually a messy merger) among The SEC, ACC, and XII.
The next couple of years will be madness.
Thread Replies (10)
Why the Big Ten, SEC alliance turned sour -- and what it means for CFP 🔗**
-- Stech
Jun 27, 2025 at 07:33 PM ET
Stech
•
06/27/25 07:33 PM ET
I told you that it's the B10 that really wants the AQ model.
-- RandomAsianGuy
Jun 28, 2025 at 02:03 PM ET
RandomAsianGuy
•
06/28/25 02:03 PM ET
Yes you did, and I posted several post saying the same.**
-- Stech
Jun 28, 2025 at 06:11 PM ET
Stech
•
06/28/25 06:11 PM ET
It gives The B1G room for an alternative alliance.
-- 33laszlo99
Jun 28, 2025 at 12:45 AM ET
33laszlo99
•
06/28/25 12:45 AM ET
Sankey and the SEC ADs want to add NO ONE. Why should they? Just
-- ancient alien 2018
Jun 28, 2025 at 04:59 PM ET
ancient alien 2018
•
06/28/25 04:59 PM ET
Now the PAC is BACK, how about PAC, ACC and B1G form another Alliance?
-- Stech
Jun 28, 2025 at 12:06 PM ET
Stech
•
06/28/25 12:06 PM ET
Kevin Warren agreed to that before.
-- HOO86
Jun 28, 2025 at 07:37 PM ET
HOO86
•
06/28/25 07:37 PM ET
Are you saying Gene Smith said, forget Alliance and go get So Cal schools?**
-- Stech
Jun 28, 2025 at 10:02 PM ET
Stech
•
06/28/25 10:02 PM ET
He said that Ohio State would not schedule PAC12 or ACC teams
-- HOO86
Jun 28, 2025 at 10:16 PM ET
HOO86
•
06/28/25 10:16 PM ET
Don't hold back the sarcasm Stech. I think it's more fun.
◄
-- 33laszlo99
Jun 28, 2025 at 01:17 PM ET
33laszlo99
•
06/28/25 01:17 PM ET