Very true. And I actually can break it down by channel and games
I know the data very well at this point and can see the patterns. So I’ve already found it very useful to get feedback here on my test charts/tables.
The short answer is that there are six clear groups.
1. P2 top tier that out perform everyone else by multiples. E.g. Ohio State
2. P2 mid tier that is always strong and justifies their spot. E.g. Texas A&M
3. P2 bottom tier that does bad numbers even when they have a good year. E.g. Northwestern
4. Non-P2 top tier that always pulls good numbers. E.g. Clemson
5. Non-P2 mid tier that is solid and gets a strong boost when they play top tier teams. E.g. VT
6. Non-P2 bottom tier that has poor numbers. E.g. Wake Forest
** Edited by HokieAl at 2/13/2025, 2:21:02 PM
Thread Replies (8)
P2 vs non from 2015-2016 in two charts
-- HokieAl
Feb 13, 2025 at 12:56 PM ET
HokieAl
•
02/13/25 12:56 PM ET
Here is the same view but showing each year separately
-- HokieAl
Feb 13, 2025 at 01:07 PM ET
HokieAl
•
02/13/25 01:07 PM ET
I really like data like this, but ...
-- Will Stewart
Feb 13, 2025 at 01:57 PM ET
Will Stewart
•
02/13/25 01:57 PM ET
Ha! Welcome to every argument ever on the internet/sports/politics/whatever**
-- VTDC
Feb 13, 2025 at 02:37 PM ET
VTDC
•
02/13/25 02:37 PM ET
Very true. And I actually can break it down by channel and games
◄
-- HokieAl
Feb 13, 2025 at 02:20 PM ET
HokieAl
•
02/13/25 02:20 PM ET
If you can write a piece that presents it like that .... 👌
-- Will Stewart
Feb 13, 2025 at 02:51 PM ET
Will Stewart
•
02/13/25 02:51 PM ET
Not going to lie...I've always wondered the same thing...**
-- MP4VT2004
Feb 15, 2025 at 12:10 AM ET
MP4VT2004
•
02/15/25 12:10 AM ET
Ha, no...just whether the last letter of your handle is...
-- MP4VT2004
Feb 15, 2025 at 01:51 PM ET
MP4VT2004
•
02/15/25 01:51 PM ET