F
Joined:
10/30/2003
Posts:
1,583
Likes:
944
I don't understand why schools voted for the brand initiative.
A majority of schools are losing money on this brand initiative so I don't understand how a majority of the schools approved this deal. I could understand 30-40% of the TV revenue being allocated based on brand but 60% is extreme. The big brand schools are going to leave anyway so it doesn't make sense to pay them more so they can save up for their reduced exit fees.
From the linked article:
The new revenue distribution model, or "brand initiative," will be based on a five-year rolling average. Sixty percent of total ACC television revenue will go toward this initiative. More weight will be given to more recent viewership. A team's total viewership will then be divided by the total ACC viewership to equal its percentage of the money available in this pool. The other 40 percent of the television revenue will be distributed evenly among all league schools.
Link:
Brand initiative
Thread Replies (28)
Bad news, ACC revenue sharing will not be kind to VT
-- HokieAl
Aug 04, 2025 at 12:15 AM ET
HokieAl
•
08/04/25 12:15 AM ET
How much $$ will a 3-9 record get? Asking for a friend.**
-- HokieNoVA
Aug 04, 2025 at 04:53 PM ET
HokieNoVA
•
08/04/25 04:53 PM ET
"bout tree fiddy"**
-- ancient alien 2018
Aug 05, 2025 at 09:26 PM ET
ancient alien 2018
•
08/05/25 09:26 PM ET
So per team, what are we looking at per year?
-- HouClone
Aug 04, 2025 at 04:34 PM ET
HouClone
•
08/04/25 04:34 PM ET
So are you an Iowa State fan?
-- hokieZ71
Aug 10, 2025 at 09:14 AM ET
hokieZ71
•
08/10/25 09:14 AM ET
“6-6 Records will get after you now” 🤣, or “win baby win baby win!” 🏈👊
-- Stech
Aug 04, 2025 at 03:31 PM ET
Stech
•
08/04/25 03:31 PM ET
Here is the proof. The sad fact is that VT has actually fallen that far
-- HokieAl
Aug 04, 2025 at 11:23 PM ET
HokieAl
•
08/04/25 11:23 PM ET
This data is 100% accurate for known viewership numbers
-- HokieAl
Aug 04, 2025 at 02:19 PM ET
HokieAl
•
08/04/25 02:19 PM ET
"All the ACC schools play on the ACCN and so all schools equally have
-- GusDaMan
Aug 08, 2025 at 12:21 PM ET
GusDaMan
•
08/08/25 12:21 PM ET
Agreed that the impact is likely not equal
-- HokieAl
Aug 08, 2025 at 02:20 PM ET
HokieAl
•
08/08/25 02:20 PM ET
That is the main problem,.......
-- 2hhoop3
Aug 04, 2025 at 02:37 PM ET
2hhoop3
•
08/04/25 02:37 PM ET
Agreed. And I can actually normalize all of that
-- HokieAl
Aug 04, 2025 at 03:41 PM ET
HokieAl
•
08/04/25 03:41 PM ET
It's a self-fulfilling prophecy by design. Of course the conference wants
-- NokieHokie
Aug 04, 2025 at 03:17 PM ET
NokieHokie
•
08/04/25 03:17 PM ET
Specifics likely vague so ACC can funnel $ to who they want to keep happy
-- hokieZ71
Aug 04, 2025 at 10:25 AM ET
hokieZ71
•
08/04/25 10:25 AM ET
Just another reason I've predicted that the ACC is dead in the water.
-- Baltimore_Hokie
Aug 04, 2025 at 10:03 AM ET
Baltimore_Hokie
•
08/04/25 10:03 AM ET
I don't understand why schools voted for the brand initiative.
◄
-- Flanker
Aug 04, 2025 at 12:28 PM ET
Flanker
•
08/04/25 12:28 PM ET
The current ACC will exist as long as the P2 decides NOT to expand.
-- manassashoo
Aug 04, 2025 at 10:37 AM ET
manassashoo
•
08/04/25 10:37 AM ET
Well that means vt needs to raise more
-- 1947Sunbowl
Aug 04, 2025 at 08:26 AM ET
1947Sunbowl
•
08/04/25 08:26 AM ET
It’s the other way around. Donations are the extra money
-- HokieAl
Aug 04, 2025 at 09:52 AM ET
HokieAl
•
08/04/25 09:52 AM ET
I think we have drifted a bit in this thread
-- HokieAl
Aug 04, 2025 at 02:28 PM ET
HokieAl
•
08/04/25 02:28 PM ET
Yeah, I find it very telling there is no info/metrics re:
-- saret
Aug 04, 2025 at 01:36 PM ET
saret
•
08/04/25 01:36 PM ET
Where did the money come from before conferences
-- Big12 guy
Aug 04, 2025 at 10:07 AM ET
Big12 guy
•
08/04/25 10:07 AM ET