The NFL does not have concurrent "rival" leagues playing at the same time and even playing their teams. The B1G and SEC may dominate air time and money, but I'm not sure their AFC/NFC concept will be widely accepted. PROS: - The B1G will have some great matchups among OSU, McChicken, PSU, USC, UCLA and a few other teams when they have good years (Sparty, Wisky, Iowa, etc.) - The SEC will have some great matchups among Bama, UGA, Okie, Texas and a few other teams when they have good years (Auburn, UT, Gators, aTm, etc.) - If they rig the playoff with a B1G playoff on one side and an SEC playoff on the other... with a B1G/SEC SuperBowl at the end, it will surely draw eyeballs for a while. CONS: - Good luck to Maryland, Rutgers, NW, Purdue, Indiana, Illinois, etc. You will be well paid for all the beatdowns. - Good luck to Vandy, UK, SCar, Mizzou, etc. You will be well paid for all the beatdowns. - Fans of schools left out will not accept their financial relegation. Clemson, FSU, Miami, VT, Oregon, Ok State, Stanford, Cal, UNC, uva, WVU, Pitt, Loserville, GT, NCSU, Colorado, ASU, Arizona, Washington, etc. The B1G and SEC won't take them all. Not even half of these. What good will a system be where Rutgers and Vandy have access that these schools don't? - Some of the power programs in the B1G and SEC will fall off (see: Nebraska). When you have all of these big programs playing each other all the time... somebody has to lose. Somebody has to be Texas LOL. The bloom will be off the rose on some of these programs. As a VT fan first and a college football fan second, I just don't see how I would be terribly interested if VT is left out. I may watch a few big games in the B1G and SEC on occasion, but my attention will remain where it has always been - VT games and ACC games that matter. The new World Order will make the B1G and SEC teams lots of money... but it will eventually kill the Golden Goose IMHO.