It’s proof that more than the top 4 are capable of winning a title
The argument against a playoff (and now against an expanded playoff) was that only 2-6 teams were really good enough to win it all.
But the reality is that most years there are only 1-3 teams that are consistently superior to everyone else and then a large group of 10-15 schools that are also talented but less consistent. That second group has always been able to compete with the top teams and occasionally pull upsets. But they were locked out of the playoffs until last year. The talent hasn’t drastically shifted, it’s just expanded opportunities for teams 5-15 to prove their worth on the field. And the SEC is showing that they are more hype than substance.
Thread Replies (8)
3rd straight year lots of SEC PO teams & none in finals, what's happening?
-- Stech
Jan 09, 2026 at 09:03 AM ET
Stech
•
01/09/26 09:03 AM ET
Can't keep players like they used to **
-- HokiesACC2004
Jan 11, 2026 at 03:56 AM ET
HokiesACC2004
•
01/11/26 03:56 AM ET
It’s proof that more than the top 4 are capable of winning a title
◄
-- HokieAl
Jan 09, 2026 at 02:22 PM ET
HokieAl
•
01/09/26 02:22 PM ET
In reality you are just talking about Uga, Bama and maybe Lsu a little.
-- VTBAMA
Jan 09, 2026 at 01:53 PM ET
VTBAMA
•
01/09/26 01:53 PM ET
I think in a world full of truly disturbing events
-- Vippie1
Jan 09, 2026 at 01:22 PM ET
Vippie1
•
01/09/26 01:22 PM ET
NIL $ has closed the gap that TV $ created for those who can afford it**
-- BROman Hokie
Jan 09, 2026 at 09:59 AM ET
BROman Hokie
•
01/09/26 09:59 AM ET
That is what i think
-- MrBayAreaHokie
Jan 09, 2026 at 08:21 PM ET
MrBayAreaHokie
•
01/09/26 08:21 PM ET