Even if the contract sucks, VT not wearing Nike would be a reputational-
downgrade. If you're buying your own gear, Nike is almost always the most expensive and nicest stuff you can get, and Nike is thought of by most athletes, especially football players, as the gold standard for sports gear. I know it sounds stupid, but if you're outfitted by anyone else, a lot of good athletes would consider it akin to getting their gear from Wal-Mart. VT agreeing to wear Adidas or, God forbid, Under Armour stuff, would be a terrible decision, even if Nike is giving, say, Ohio State more gear/money.
For BC, being outfitted by New Balance makes a lot of sense, because (1) New Balance is HQ'ed in Boston; and (2) BC Athletics is not a serious organization.
Thread Replies (2)
another peer school transaction
-- 1947Sunbowl
Jun 02, 2025 at 01:49 PM ET
1947Sunbowl
•
06/02/25 01:49 PM ET
Even if the contract sucks, VT not wearing Nike would be a reputational-
◄
-- Baltimore_Hokie
Jun 03, 2025 at 10:29 AM ET
Baltimore_Hokie
•
06/03/25 10:29 AM ET
New Balance is based in Boston. I’m not sure this counts as chess.**
-- ColumbusHokie
Jun 02, 2025 at 08:57 PM ET
ColumbusHokie
•
06/02/25 08:57 PM ET