right? And they contradict the "assigned at birth" belief that many people have? You can't argue that someone who was born a male should have to play against men while also arguing that someone who was born a female should have to play against men because of a genetic anomaly. Regardless, your point about the female boxer has zero to do with a person transitioning from male to female to gain an advantage. She was born female. Competed as female her whole life. And it wasn't until she found success that suddenly her "eligibility" became scrutinized. It's basically the complete opposite of the point you're trying to question.