No need to release early versions of the CFP. That committee ends up painting a picture they don't need to before the last ones. I know people are complaining about tie-breakers and JMU/Tulane...guess what, the rules were already set. They have had to kick the can down the road on deciding the rules in the near future. Also, there is no difference between this and the men's tourney...it just sticks out more when 1/6 of the play-offs are only in because of conference champions. I do agree that there should be a minimum ranking when including conference championship (if staying at t12 teams, maybe top 20 or top 16. In all honesty, I would rather use the BCS and use a committee vote for the human aspect even if they push it to 24 teams.