L
Joined:
05/04/2012
Posts:
4,772
Likes:
3,382
Do we have a Tuten?
I asked chatgpt what it could dig up just for the heck of it about our running backs group:
Virginia Tech's running back room is one of the more intriguing position groups on the roster under new head coach James Franklin. Franklin has always preferred a physical run game with multiple backs contributing, and he brought in longtime Penn State assistant and running backs coach Norval McKenzie to oversee the position. ([si.com][1])
Here's how I see the room shaping up, along with everything publicly available on their speed.
### 1. Marcellous Hawkins (Sr.) – The likely starter
* 5'10", 223 lbs
* Transfer from Central Missouri
* Ran for **749 yards at 6.3 yards per carry** in 2025.
* Powerful between the tackles but has shown enough burst to rip off chunk runs. He isn't known as a pure burner, but he's faster than his build suggests. ([gobblercountry.com][2])
**Known speed**
* I could not find a verified 100-meter time or laser-timed 40.
* Recruiting services generally described him as having good acceleration rather than elite top-end speed.
**Projection**
He's the guy who wears defenses down. Think more "move the chains and break tackles" than "80-yard touchdown every game."
---
### 2. Jeffrey Overton Jr. (r-Fr.) – The explosive option
* 5'9", 205 lbs
* One of the breakout names from spring practice.
* Coaches and local media consistently mention his explosiveness. ([gobblercountry.com][3])
**Known speed**
* No verified 100m or 40 has been published.
* High school film shows excellent acceleration and lateral quickness.
**Projection**
If one back on this roster becomes the home-run hitter, I'd bet on Overton.
---
### 3. Messiah Mickens (Fr.)
The highest-profile recruit in the room.
* Four-star recruit
* Around 5'10", 212 lbs
* One of Virginia Tech's biggest recruiting wins at RB in years. ([si.com][4])
**Known speed**
Here's where it gets interesting.
I couldn't find an officially FAT-timed 100 meters like the 10.7 example you mentioned.
However:
* He reportedly ran in the **4.5-second range in the 40-yard dash** during recruiting evaluations.
* His verified recruiting testing also included excellent shuttle and explosion numbers, which helped make him a blue-chip prospect.
He's more of a complete back than a track guy.
---
### 4. Tyler Mason (r-So.)
* 5'10", 211 lbs
* Developmental back with good balance.
**Known speed**
* No verified 40 or 100m that I could locate.
---
### 5. Bill Davis (r-Jr.)
* 5'9", 230 lbs
Built like a bowling ball.
**Known speed**
* No published testing.
* More of a short-yardage, physical runner than a speed threat.
---
## Fastest guys?
Based on available recruiting information and film—not just stopwatch numbers—I would rank the room like this:
| Player | Top-end speed | Burst |
| ------------------ | ------------- | ----- |
| Jeffrey Overton | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Messiah Mickens | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐½ |
| Marcellous Hawkins | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Tyler Mason | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ |
| Bill Davis | ⭐⭐½ | ⭐⭐⭐ |
---
## Were any track stars?
Interestingly, none of the current scholarship backs have widely documented elite track credentials like:
* 10.6–10.8 100m
* 21-second 200m
* verified 4.3 forty
Virginia Tech has had backs like that in the past (Bhayshul Tuten eventually ran a **4.32** at the NFL Combine), but this current room is built more around football athleticism than track résumés. ([reuters.com][5])
## Overall outlook
I actually think this group has a chance to be one of the strengths of the offense.
* **Hawkins** is the dependable every-down back.
* **Overton** brings the explosive-change-of-pace element.
* **Mickens** has the talent to force his way into the rotation as a freshman if he picks up pass protection and the playbook.
* The depth behind them is solid enough that Franklin can rotate fresh legs, which has been a hallmark of his best offenses.
** Edited by likehokies at 7/25/2026, 2:49:36 PM
Thread Replies (32)
My preseason thoughts on each position group (Better, Same, Worse)
-- MKD
Jul 24, 2026 at 09:34 AM ET
MKD
•
07/24/26 09:34 AM ET
Don’t agree with the OL being the same at all. Lots of new faces added to
-- SCHokie1103
Jul 25, 2026 at 12:01 PM ET
SCHokie1103
•
07/25/26 12:01 PM ET
I'm really excited as well. Should be a fun season. GO HOKIES **
-- MKD
Jul 25, 2026 at 07:50 PM ET
MKD
•
07/25/26 07:50 PM ET
How on earth do you have LB as worse? Chambers >>>> Keller for ceiling
-- hokiepro
Jul 24, 2026 at 01:18 PM ET
hokiepro
•
07/24/26 01:18 PM ET
I cannot ID a position group as same or worse than last year
-- hokiepro
Jul 24, 2026 at 01:22 PM ET
hokiepro
•
07/24/26 01:22 PM ET
I'd say better because all but one starter is back I think
-- BigDaddyHokie
Jul 26, 2026 at 09:12 PM ET
BigDaddyHokie
•
07/26/26 09:12 PM ET
When it comes to VT sports… Pro Knows
-- vtchem75
Jul 24, 2026 at 06:42 PM ET
vtchem75
•
07/24/26 06:42 PM ET
We’re deeper than last yr at every position except DT with the Laws injury
-- hokiepro
Jul 25, 2026 at 07:34 AM ET
hokiepro
•
07/25/26 07:34 AM ET
Good observations pro **
-- VaTechHokiesACC
Jul 26, 2026 at 07:11 AM ET
VaTechHokiesACC
•
07/26/26 07:11 AM ET
There are really a couple of ways
-- Tidewater Hillbilly
Jul 24, 2026 at 12:58 PM ET
Tidewater Hillbilly
•
07/24/26 12:58 PM ET
Tend to agree with overall assessment
-- MaryWashGrad
Jul 24, 2026 at 12:53 PM ET
MaryWashGrad
•
07/24/26 12:53 PM ET
7-5 meets my expectations. But I have to admit
-- VT ChemE 1986
Jul 24, 2026 at 06:36 PM ET
VT ChemE 1986
•
07/24/26 06:36 PM ET
Exactly my thoughts. 8-4 would be an outstanding season with this roster **
-- MKD
Jul 25, 2026 at 08:53 AM ET
MKD
•
07/25/26 08:53 AM ET
Pretty accurate. LBs being worse is a terrifying thought**
-- NOFX
Jul 24, 2026 at 12:43 PM ET
NOFX
•
07/24/26 12:43 PM ET
But they’re not. Not close **
-- hokiepro
Jul 24, 2026 at 01:23 PM ET
hokiepro
•
07/24/26 01:23 PM ET
Yeah, I don't agree with that **
-- HokiesACC2004
Jul 25, 2026 at 12:22 AM ET
HokiesACC2004
•
07/25/26 12:22 AM ET
Curious what you think our record will be.
-- VT ChemE 1986
Jul 24, 2026 at 12:08 PM ET
VT ChemE 1986
•
07/24/26 12:08 PM ET
7-5 but will require winning some high scoring games (shootouts)**
-- MKD
Jul 24, 2026 at 12:24 PM ET
MKD
•
07/24/26 12:24 PM ET
Our defense won't be worse than last year **
-- HokiesACC2004
Jul 25, 2026 at 12:23 AM ET
HokiesACC2004
•
07/25/26 12:23 AM ET
7-5 is reasonable but
-- Planner_Hokie
Jul 24, 2026 at 02:10 PM ET
Planner_Hokie
•
07/24/26 02:10 PM ET
If LBs are "worse" then they must be awful and we know the LB coach**
-- George Baylor
Jul 24, 2026 at 11:21 AM ET
George Baylor
•
07/24/26 11:21 AM ET
Yeah, if LBs are worse then it's going to be a long season. **
-- 40ozDistrict
Jul 24, 2026 at 11:32 AM ET
40ozDistrict
•
07/24/26 11:32 AM ET
O-line is....Better.....IMHO**
-- vtchem75
Jul 24, 2026 at 10:15 AM ET
vtchem75
•
07/24/26 10:15 AM ET
You realize that mess of an OL last year was top 5 in running efficiency?
-- Happy Dog
Jul 25, 2026 at 07:18 AM ET
Happy Dog
•
07/25/26 07:18 AM ET
+1- better blind side protection, more depth to keep them refreshed and
-- tallahasseehokie
Jul 25, 2026 at 09:34 AM ET
tallahasseehokie
•
07/25/26 09:34 AM ET
They took a lot of undue blame last year
-- Happy Dog
Jul 25, 2026 at 09:36 AM ET
Happy Dog
•
07/25/26 09:36 AM ET
Hopefully so, but I don't expect much improvement this year.
-- MKD
Jul 24, 2026 at 12:25 PM ET
MKD
•
07/24/26 12:25 PM ET
Depth and play are two different metrics**
-- Tombo
Jul 24, 2026 at 09:06 PM ET
Tombo
•
07/24/26 09:06 PM ET
You do realize we brought in better players and have way more depth!?**
-- hokiepro
Jul 24, 2026 at 01:24 PM ET
hokiepro
•
07/24/26 01:24 PM ET
Hope you're right. On offense I agree better players and depth.
-- MKD
Jul 24, 2026 at 04:41 PM ET
MKD
•
07/24/26 04:41 PM ET