Login | Sign Up
TechSideline

All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

Men's Basketball Board
▶
V
Joined: 10/02/2005
Posts: 12,521
Likes: 16,743
vtox1
Subscriber

Gurdak to Rutgers only makes VT look poor on NIL if he is going to be 6th

Or 7th man not sure that is the case? We prioritized Hansberry, if Gurdak is likely Rutgers starter at the 5 then he is worth more to them than VT and we have the better starter at the 5.
Posted: 04/17/2026 at 11:59 PM ET

Thread Replies (28)

Full Thread →
Gurdak to Rutgers only makes VT look poor on NIL if he is going to be 6th ◄
vtox1 • 04/17/26 11:59 PM ET
Amusing to me that guys were desperate to keep Gurdak.
Snape • 04/19/26 11:57 AM ET
"Guys"? Certain folks, yes. A couple have a more nuanced take on players
ancient alien 2018 • 04/19/26 06:01 PM ET
To be clear...im in the camp that Gurdak was the 2nd priority on my list
GCHokie34 • 04/19/26 04:35 PM ET
He wasn’t second on my list but I agree with your sentiment.
NC Hoke • 04/19/26 06:02 PM ET
Gurdak will probably be on 4 different teams in 4 years **
OrlandoHokie • 04/18/26 08:33 PM ET
I genuinely do not see him as that type...
GCHokie34 • 04/19/26 04:37 PM ET
And then ask for a 5th!!**
ancient alien 2018 • 04/18/26 09:01 PM ET
^^I tried that at the Golden Corral steak station.
KCHokie2 • 04/19/26 06:18 AM ET
I think idealistically we would have been recruiting a starting 5
NC Hoke • 04/18/26 02:55 PM ET
Gurdak was clearly a distant #4 return priority - if that.
marcbvtgm • 04/22/26 09:19 AM ET
For next season, the loss of depth at the 5 position where replacements
NC Hoke • 04/22/26 01:06 PM ET
He's probably going to be a starter there. Wouldn't have been that here.**
David CunninghamAdmin • 04/18/26 01:33 PM ET
So we are going to get a big that’s better than gurdak
AnotherTechW • 04/19/26 06:45 AM ET
Probably depends on how you define "better"
GCHokie34 • 04/19/26 04:32 PM ET
So we are getting someone better than him at the 5 or Hansberry playing the
HokieBrazil • 04/18/26 02:51 PM ET
Hansberry isn't going to be our 5.
EDGEMAN • 04/18/26 05:14 PM ET
Huh?Gurdak would have been a starter with Hansberry moving to the 4**
HokieBrazil • 04/18/26 06:11 AM ET
Only if he gains an outside shot and 4 or 5 inches in his vertical.**
jrc3rd • 04/18/26 05:34 PM ET
And can suddenly move faster than a glacier outside the charge arc**
marcbvtgm • 04/19/26 05:29 PM ET
4 or 5. That would be 4.5 or 5.5 vertical inches. too low**
Windows NT • 04/18/26 08:53 PM ET
So just like Poteat then**
HokieBrazil • 04/18/26 07:05 PM ET
He’s way better than poteat. Like ALOT better and at younger age **
AnotherTechW • 04/19/26 09:18 AM ET
Agree,was making a point that Poteat was a starter and didn't have an
HokieBrazil • 04/19/26 10:54 AM ET
I certainly wanted him to stay and he obviously was well coached in high
jrc3rd • 04/19/26 01:21 PM ET
Agree, G at the 5, Hans at the 4. GURDAK is a BIG Loss and big + for Rut!**
George Baylor • 04/18/26 04:16 PM ET
Maybe Maybe not. May want to wait until 26-27 to see if that happens**
ancient alien 2018 • 04/18/26 07:30 PM ET
What??????????? Huh????????????????? good grief**
ancient alien 2018 • 04/18/26 04:44 AM ET
I think he might be saying
Vippie1 • 04/18/26 10:07 AM ET