All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

V
Joined: 01/01/2005
Posts: 7,328
Likes: 10,055

Pretty much anybody other than Duke, Pitt, UNC and Clemson

I disagree on our talent level. Our weakness at PG has exacerbated everything else with this team. If we had an ACC level, experienced PG we would likely be close to 0.500 on the year. Our other weakness has been at center. Poteat has been unable to provide the scoring punch this offense grew accustomed to and it has put pressure on all the other spots. Wessler has played well in a back-up role, but is not ready for prime time. We have talent at the other spots, but they are all inexperienced except for Burnham. Most of the teams in the ACC are really BAD this year. We can win anywhere from 4-8 ACC games the rest of the year. I am going to guess we end up at 5-15. ** Edited by VT ChemE 1986 at 1/2/2025, 11:05:04 AM
Posted: 01/02/2025 at 10:57 AM ET
(In response to this post by George Baylor)

Thread Replies (10)

Full Thread →
Hokies all, Happy New Year, But who do we beat in ACC?
George Baylor 01/02/25 08:18 AM ET
We’ve played the 2 best teams in the conference
soflahokie 01/02/25 01:07 PM ET
Pretty much anybody other than Duke, Pitt, UNC and Clemson
VT ChemE 1986 01/02/25 10:57 AM ET
CE 86, hope you are correct, but really doubt 4 ACC W's. Yes our PG is BAD!**
George Baylor 01/02/25 01:00 PM ET
Not ready for prime time?
DAngelo828 01/02/25 12:51 PM ET
Wessler will be fine once the game slows down for him, he is moving too
39hokies 01/03/25 03:36 PM ET
I think the best I can say about Wessler is he is the best Center
Femoyer Hokie 01/02/25 03:17 PM ET
As he is the only true 5 we have I must agree. Poteat is a 4 being forced
uber hokie 01/02/25 09:24 PM ET
I am one of the few Wessler fans on this board
VT ChemE 1986 01/02/25 01:23 PM ET
I am 100% Wessler fan…
DAngelo828 01/02/25 04:57 PM ET
I ran the numbers
VT ChemE 1986 01/03/25 02:30 PM ET