Inside The Numbers: Offensive Production, And Homegrown Programs

12 Comments

1. 

   vfrhokie August 27, 2026 at 9:49 AM

   Stanford's median being higher than its average is an interesting statistical anomaly.
2. 

   turn2296 August 27, 2026 at 9:00 AM

   Virginia talent has fallen off a bit, we should protect the state but also raid NC and Tennessee. Maryland seems to be Franklin’s specialty already which is great
3. 

   ad nauseam August 27, 2026 at 7:43 AM

   initially i guessed state, but that fact GT is the most local should have been a layup.
4. 

   RustyHokie94 August 26, 2026 at 11:55 PM

   Smack dab in the middle and Return of the King? LFGOOOOO!
5. 

   JimJamsYams August 26, 2026 at 8:38 PM

   Return of the king reference. Salute.
   1. 

      Atlee Hokie August 26, 2026 at 9:29 PM

      Kind a like the Time of Troubles between Vasili IV (1606-1610) and Mikhail I (Romanov) (1613). Except our "Time of Troubles" lasted much longer. Hopefully Franklin I will be the new king, emperor, or czar. I'm looking forward to him solidly occupying the throne for a long time.
6. 

   3TechFanz August 26, 2026 at 6:02 PM

   Love the last paragraph. So true. Go get it back. 6 hour radius is all we need to be very successful.
7. 

   Stork August 26, 2026 at 5:13 PM

   As advised a million times before, kids attending out of state academies make home grown talent comparisons worthless. Until/unless someone takes the time to research where a kid is really from, missing this data completely.
   1. 

      Chris Coleman August 26, 2026 at 6:30 PM

      It's not a tremendous amount of them, though. With 100+ guys on the roster, the exercise can be done and we can determine a general trend, if not the exact number that we'd get if we knew exactly where everyone is from.
8. 

   Freddyburg Hokie August 26, 2026 at 3:46 PM

   FYI, the table sorting is a bit off. Looking at Avg Miles, sorted lowest to highest, it starts off with 1,092 and 1,501, then goes to 261, 291....816, 850. Sorting by character/string, not number?
   1. 

      Chris Coleman August 26, 2026 at 6:31 PM

      Probably some sort of a bug that came in with the new site. I'll get Will to look at it.
   2. 

      Will Stewart August 26, 2026 at 8:14 PM

      Fixed. You'll appreciate this, Freddyburg ... the numbers in a few of the table cells that exceeded 1,000 were typed with commas in them, and that threw off the sorting. Once I removed the commas, the sorting started working properly. So this was not a Code Puppy exercise. This was Will looking at it and having an engineering brain and knowing how to fix it.